Navigation

Forum Threads

Newest Threads
No Threads created
Hottest Threads
No Threads created

Latest Articles

No Articles available

Login

Username

Password

Remember Me


3pollyc 3pollyc
10:47:10 Offline
Kris12345 Kris12345
15:59:36 Offline
el_fudgeeo el_fudgeeo
18:57:28 Offline
brulin brulin
1 day Offline Offline
jem_389 jem_389
3 days Offline Offline

Shoutbox

You must login to post a message.

26/08/2010 13:03
I just realized that Scratch1 passed the 5000 cache mark. Wow....

19/08/2010 21:28
Don't forget to vote for the SCAR2010 cache awards. Follow link on the wrap up event page.

09/08/2010 16:26
Hi everyone! Hope you are having a great summer and finding lots of caches!!!!! Grin

26/07/2010 08:11
Just a reminder about the July Meet and Greet (GC2BQDP). Hope to see you there.

25/07/2010 14:28
Just saw one of our Saskatchewan 2008 coins pass into and out of Headquarters!!

UPCOMMING TRESPASS LAW COMMING INTO EFFECT

NewsHere is the website with the full writing.
http://www.plea.org/freepubs/newspaper/20090109Trespass.htm
Basically.... if the land is fenced or bordered by a natural object (trees, river, etc.) you must have permission to be on that land. This can cause issues for geocaches that are in place as we speak. Even if the geocacher that had placed the cache had permission, every geocacher in search of the cache must have permission from the landowner as well.
From what I understand, if the authorities ask you if you have permission, and you say "NO"... you are automatically charged and there will be nothing we can do about it.
The law does have a exception set aside for people engaged in legal hunting, fishing, and trapping. These activities will still be under the old rule…. If it’s not posted…. It’s ok!

Please post you comments

Comments

#1 | nirakmit on March 04 2009 10:29:11
If a landowner allows a geocacher to place a cache on their land, then that would extend permission to access the land to those searching for the cache. I would hope that the landowner would be informed of why there is a cache being placed there and the possibility of people searching for it at all hours.

I haven't visited the link yet, so may be it's stated differently there, but from what parker2 summarized, it sounds fine.

I don't think this is a bad law. This is common sense and part of Groundspeak's rules for placing a geocache. Makes sense to me. Smile
#2 | Firesong on March 10 2009 10:16:51
I had a read too. If it's enclosed in fences then it's iffy. But mostly the land we place stuff on isn't. Besides.. we can say that we are 'hunting' geocaches. Wink
#3 | jem_389 on March 21 2009 10:58:34
It does seem ludicrous that someone who's hunting (with a lethal weapon!!!!!) would have open permission to go and shoot up land and properlt just because someone didn't post no-humting signs around it, however someone "hunting" for a geocache and not likely to cause any damage to the property, is charged. I guess the trick then is to carry a rifle with you when geocaching and if stopped just say you were hunting dangerous and evil goecaches.
#4 | nirakmit on March 22 2009 15:49:25
You'll just have to get a hunting license in order to wander someone's property with a gun. I wonder if they'll call the cops if you show up for a hunting license and say you're hunting those "dangerous and evil geocaches"! Grin
#5 | parker2 on July 19 2009 14:26:44
Well it was passed through the goverment last week (01 July 09) as bill-43. If you would like a copy of this bill, you can email myself, or retreve it from the SK Gov. website.

Post Comment

Please Login to Post a Comment.

Ratings

Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Render time: 0.68 seconds
309,418 unique visits